Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos, centers on this debate between these two philosophical adversaries. In his book Gordon examines the background of the debate. Heidegger and/or Cassirer at Davos. GEOFFREY WAITE. Cornell University. There was a famous discussion between Heidegger and Ernst Cassirer in Davos . In Ernst Cassirer and Martin Heidegger participated in a momentous debate in Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos, centers on this debate between these two.
|Published (Last):||21 May 2010|
|PDF File Size:||6.43 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.81 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
You are commenting using your Facebook account. Clearly, but if Heidegger was wearing one of his ski outfits it may have been a different story.
In chapter 6 Gordon jumps forward from the debate and traces the subsequent course of Cassirer’s and Heidegger’s thought and lives. Through a close and painstaking heidegger, Gordon dissects the exchange itself to reveal that it was at core a philosophical disagreement over what it means to be human.
They were arguably the most important thinkers in Europe, and their exchange touched upon the most urgent questions in the history of philosophy: You are commenting using your WordPress. The book can usefully be read as a sequel to Gordon’s earlier work, for the two books together draw ccassirer extraordinary picture of a unique moment in the history of twentieth-century German philosophy and culture.
He takes Cassirer to have been “indisputably” one of the greatest philosophers of the twentieth century and, even more volubly, “one of the greatest philosophers and intellectual heidegged to emerge from the cultural ferment of modern Germany.
As Gordon explains, the Davos debate would continue to both inspire and provoke well after the two men had gone their separate ways. Thus, Cassirer’s historical narratives committed him to some kind of recognition of human finitude while Heidegger’s preoccupation with the possibility of making authentic choices led him in to celebrate the “will to power” of Germany’s Nazi youth.
Heidegger agreed that “In this dvos of the going-beyond of finitude, there lies a quite central problem. The community of Davos, Switzerland, had started in the late s to run yearly University seminars lasting some three weeks each. Heidegger, Cassirer, Davosis due out this month.
Cassirer–Heidegger debate – Wikipedia
Gordon’s second chapter describes the setting of Cassirer’s and Heidegger’s debate. Edward Heideggeg is an apt character to think about at Christmas-time. Here, in a reconstruction at once historical and philosophical, Peter Gordon reexamines the conversation, its origins and its aftermath, resuscitating an event that davo become cxssirer in its own mythology. Retrieved from ” https: It was a moment when German Jews seemed finally to have gained full social and political acceptance and they had become a davoa and stimulating element in German cultural life.
Cassirer, with more difficulty, also strove to accommodate these casslrer energies by turning Kant’s epistemology into a historically and ethnologically oriented philosophy of symbolic forms. Our recent titles are available via Edelweiss.
Heidegger, in turn, criticized the neo-Kantian interpretation of Kant which, he said, had reduced the first Critique to a theory of knowledge for the natural sciences when it should in fact be read as laying the groundwork of a metaphysics — a somewhat contentious claim that Heidegger would elaborate in his book Kant and the Problem of Metaphysicspublished in late To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Gordon reconstructs the debate between Heidegger and Cassirer, demonstrating its significance as a point of rupture in Continental thought that implicated all the major philosophical movements of the day.
But, it ddavos be added, philosophical systems tend to be amalgams generated from many components derived from multiple sources. Having given a broad first outline of Cassirer’s and Heidegger’s respective positions, he proceeds in his first chapter to analyze the situation of German philosophy at the heivegger of the Davos encounter.
Their disagreement can be understood only if we appreciate their common point of departure as thinkers of the German interwar crisis, an era of rebellion that touched all of the major philosophical movements of the day—life-philosophy, philosophical anthropology, neo-Kantianism, phenomenology, and existentialism. He grants accordingly that it would be “foolish to believe that Rosenzweig was ever much more than a minor curiosity within the larger drama of Continental philosophy.
The Cassirer—Heidegger debate is an encounter between Martin Heidegger and Ernst Cassirer in March in DavosSwitzerland  concerning the significance of Kantian notions of freedom and rationality. Attempts to revive his fortunes are, I am afraid, doomed to failure.
His nonsense books, mo …. Cassirer was no doubt an accomplished philosopher, an influential teacher, and above all a thoroughly decent and admirable human being, but he does not get close in stature to the much more problematic Heidegger, and he certainly also lacks the philosophical radicalism of a Wittgenstein, Foucault, or Heldegger and the incisive scientific acumen of a Russell, Quine, or Rawls.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. Cool, controlled, assured in its grasp of the historical sources, exhilarating in its analytic skills, the book highlights a whole and important epoch in intellectual history while focusing on a single, illuminating facet. Over the last eighty years the Davos encounter has acquired an allegorical significance, as if it marked an ultimate and irreparable rupture in twentieth-century Continental thought.
Through a close and painstaking analysis, Gordon dissects the exchange itself to heideegger that it was at core a philosophical disagreement over what it means to be human. Fruitless as it was in the end for the two antagonists, the debate in fact stirred from the start an unusually wide interest. Cassirer’s neidegger as a professor of philosophy at Hamburg and then as rector of that University and as the consummate interpreter of the Kantian tradition testifies to this fact.
Heidegger’s Being and Time, which had put him at the center of German philosophy inreadily incorporated all these new forces.
Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos – Wikipedia
Cassirer questioned whether Heidegger, with his belief in human finitude, could have any place for non-relative truth and objective knowledge. Their disagreement can be understood only if we appreciate their common point of departure as thinkers of the German interwar crisis, an era of rebellion that touched all of the major philosophical movements of the day—life-philosophy, philosophical anthropology, neo-Kantianism, phenomenology, and existentialism.
Gordon is well aware of the decisive role of Heidegger in twentieth-century philosophy.