In view of his talent and taking into account his recognition, the publishers of ” Ananda Vikatan” approached him to license his drawings for. Get your digital copy of Aval Vikatan Magazine – January 15, issue on Magzter and enjoy reading it on iPad, iPhone, Android devices and the web.
|Published (Last):||16 February 2013|
|PDF File Size:||18.70 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.64 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
It is presented by the Tamil language weekly magazine Ananda Vikatan. Srineevasan, a well known and renowned artist, popularly known as “Silpi” hereinafter referred to as the “Silpi”. The above directions are without prejudice to the contentions of the respective parties in the civil suit and the copyright claimed man the first respondent.
Aval Vikatan – அவள் விகடன் – Issue date – 01 January
Feeling aggrieved by the decision in the interlocutory application, the appellant is before us. The learned Judge, from the documents available on record arrived at a prima facie case that late Silpi functioned only as an employee from to For the song “Mannipaaya” from Vinnaithaandi Varuvaayaa.
Since the works in question were made during the period of employment, the publisher has got the first ownership of copyright. The Supreme Court in Dalpat Kumar vs. If notability cannot be established, the article is likely to be mergedredirectedor deleted.
Ananda Vikatan Cinema Awards
Srinivasan, a well known and renowned artist. This intra court appeal is directed against the order and decretal order dated 9 November avaal O.
For the song “Va Machane” from Irudhi Suttru. Ananda Vikatan in Tamil. The name of Silpi as the author of the work is disclosed in the books along with Silpi’s photo printed on book’s cover. In view of the disclosures and completion of printing, balance of convenience is not in favour of granting injunction.
Yet, the settled principle of law is that even where prima facie case is in favour of the plaintiff, the Court will refuse temporary injunction if the injury suffered by the plaintiff on account of refusal of temporary injunction was not irreparable. Therefore, the ownership of copyright vested only with Silpi and the appellant inherited the said right.
According 213 the learned Judge, Section 17 of the Copyright Act,clearly stipulates that the work done as an employee in the magazine is to be treated to be the ownership of the owner, who has the right of reproduction in similar newspaper or magazine.
First owner of copyright – Subject to the provisions of this Act, the author of a work shall be vi,atan first owner of the copyright therein:. He was a vikatzn artist. We are in complete agreement with the views expressed by the learned Single Judge. The ceremony’s main broadcaster is Sun TV. There existed a relationship of employer-employee and it was a continuous relationship till without any break.
The learned Judge found that the works sought to be published related to that period when Silpi was under the employment of respondents and not earlier or later date. The present attempt is only compilation and reproduction of the very same art works in the form of a book.
Third parties, who have not played any part in such creation should not be given the benefits by its unlawful reproduction. In addition, temporary injunction being an equitable relief, the discretion to grant such relief will be exercised only when the plaintiff’s conduct is free from blame and he approaches the court with clean hands.
All the tools and stationery, including pen, pencil, paint, brush, drawing sheets etc. Thiru Thiru Thuru Thuru. Because of the difference in colour, it cannot be said that the publisher is guilty of distortion.
The texts prepared by Silpi were edited by the editorial team of Ananda Vikatan and thereafter, the works were published in the magazine under the title “Thennatu Selvangal”. Retrieved 19 January In case injunction is granted, it would cause irreparable loss to the first respondent. The first respondent is said to have already printed copies of the book. The woks of Silpi contain an introduction of the pictures and drawings.
There is no dispute that all these works were earlier published in Ananda Vikatan during the period from to Naduvula Konjam Pakkatha Kaanom.
Vikatan launches premium offering Aval Kitchen | MxMIndia
The awards were introduced in the yearhonouring the films that were released in The famous Tamil poet Namakkal Kavingar recognized his talent and made him to join in the Government School of Arts and Vikaran at Madras, sometime during From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The book contains only the works published from to Irreparable injury, viktan, does not mean that there must be no physical possibility of repairing the injury, but means only that the injury must be a material one, namely one that cannot be adequately compensated by way of damages The write up produced by the respondents contains a vikztan that Silpi left Ananda Vikatan which he had served for years and joined Bhavans Journal in Bombay.
Since Silpi died intestate, his right over his works devolved on the appellant and his sister and they have been exploiting the copyright by licensing them to publishers, Corporate entities and Government Departments in various ways including vikatzn using them in calendars, greeting cards, jaan etc.
The first respondent has included the black and white copies of the pictures in the book. It is for this purpose, the Copyright Act was enacted. The legality and correctness of the rival contentions can be decided only after adducing evidence by both sides. We are now concerned only with the prima facie case and as to whether balance of convenience is in favour of granting injunction and thereafter, the question of irreparable injury.
Retrieved 15 May Views Read Edit View history. The appellant has produced the artistic work in colour.