Description. ASTM G Standard Practice for Calculation of Corrosion Rates and Related Information from Electrochemical Measurements. View more. ASTM G()e1. Standard Practice for Calculation of Corrosion Rates and Related Information from Electrochemical Measurements. ASTM-G Standard Practice for Calculation of Corrosion Rates and Related Information from Electrochemical Measurements – corrosion.
|Published (Last):||7 June 2011|
|PDF File Size:||4.65 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.33 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Icor icor 5 A 1 where: B icor 5 R 10 p where: NOTE 4— Eq 4 was used to make these calculations. The estimation of a B value for situations involving mixed control requires more information in general and is beyond the scope of this standard.
In cases where the actual analysis of an alloy is not available, it aastm conventional to use the mid-range of the composition speci? A superscript epsilon e indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval. Generally, this error is small with modest scan rates Other redox couples that do not necessarily participate in the corrosion reaction may have similar effects.
Therefore, the gram equivalents of the dissolved components are given by Eq 3. Sometimes it is awtm to analyze the corrosion products and use those results to establish the proper valence. These diagrams are known as Potential-pH Pourbaix diagrams and have been published by several authors 2, 3.
A sample calculation is given in Appendix X4. Some approaches for estimating this information are given. This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every? Although the conversion of these current values into mass loss rates sstm penetration rates is based on Faraday’s Law, the calculations can be complicated for alloys and metals with elements having multiple valence values.
ASTM G Standard Practice – Free Download PDF
The appropriate diagrams for the various alloying elements can be consulted to estimate the stable valence of each element at the temperature, atsm, and pH of the contacting electrolyte that existed during the test. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the asrm of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
Some approaches for estimating this information are given. This is accomplished by dividing the total current by the geometric area of the electrode exposed to the solution. Corrosion Current Density 4. See Refs for more information. In this case, the concentration of the corroding electrode ions is generally of the same magnitude or higher than other ions participating in the corrosion process in the electrolyte surrounding the electrode.
Originally published as G — KRT b 5 nF 9 where: Link to Active This link will always route to the current Active version of the standard.
NOTE 4—Electrodes exhibiting stable gg102 will behave as if the anodic reaction were diffusion limited, except that the passive current density is not affected by agitation. Q 5 Wi 3 where: Current edition approved Feb.
NOTE 2—Mid-range values were assumed for concentrations of alloying elements.
It is assumed that the current distributes uniformly across the area used in this calculation. Calculation methods for converting corrosion current density values to either mass loss rates or average penetration rates are given for most engineering alloys. A sample calculation is given in Appendix X5. This calculation may be expressed as follows: Calculation methods for converting corrosion current density values to either mass loss rates or average penetration rates are given for most engineering alloys.
Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the responsible technical committee, which you may attend. In some computerized polarization equipment, this calculation is made automatically after the specimen area is programmed into the computer.
Ra 5 the apparent polarization resistance, ohm cm2, r 5 the electrolyte resistivity in ohm cm, l 5 the distance between the specimen electrode and the Luggin probe tip, or the reference electrode in cm, and Rp 5 the true polarization resistance in ohm cm2. In cases where the corrosion potential is within 50 to mV of the reversible potential of the corroding electrode, the electrochemical reactions will occur simultaneously on the electrode surface.
A sample calculation is given in Appendix X2 1.
The error is illustrated by Eq The capacitance charging effect will cause the calculated polarization resistance to be in error.
Normally only elements above 1 mass percent in the alloy are included in the calculation. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.
Some typical values of equivalent weights for a variety of metals and alloys are provided. B Registered trademark Haynes International.
ASTM G102 Standard Practice
If this is not true, then the calculation approach will need to be adjusted to re? The conversion of these results to either mass loss or penetration rates requires additional electrochemical information. The effect of solution resistance is a function of the cell geometry, but the following expression may be used to approximate its astmm.
This practice is intended to provide guidance in calculating mass loss and penetration rates for such alloys. NOTE 2—Some of t102 older publications used inaccurate thermodynamic data to construct the diagrams and consequently they are in error.
Consider a unit mass of alloy oxidized. G1102 this case, the magnitude of the error is proportional to scan rate. Some typical values of equivalent weights for a variety of metals and alloys are provided.
Last previous edition G — 89 e1.